Keep up to date with medical news in Australia.
Posted by Beat Medical
The Sydney Morning Herald reported recently that out of patients surveyed, 9% responded that they would put off seeing their GP due to the fees.
The central question we might ask is- how responsible is the individual for their own healthcare costs?
Of course, one must also consider the commercial viability of being a GP, which can be an expensive endeavour. With business on-costs like rent, utilities, insurance, as well as paying staff and employed GPs, margins for owners of GP practices are slim. As a recruitment company, we often deal with GP practices who are very price sensitive, for whom it is less expensive to shut down for a break rather than employ a locum.
If we assume is expensive to run a GP practice, who then is responsible to making sure GPs are able to effectively service their patients, as well as making an acceptable living? Should the government increase the MBS items to close the gap between the private fee and the bulk billing fee? Or, should it simply operate as a free market economy, with the price and access being determined by market forces and the buying power of the consumer?
From a medical recruitment perspective, we find that the practices that are at least mixed billing are generally more able to meet market rates for staffing costs (with the exception of government-funded Superclinics). This means greater access to GPs for the patients of those practices. However, for those practices who believe in government funded healthcare, and offer a no-gap, bulk billing service to their patients, is it fair that their financial margins often prohibit engaging professional help with recruitment?
Read the original SMH article here.
What are your thoughts? Leave a comment below...
Posted by Beat Medical
The Sydney Morning Herald reported today that in a recent MJA article, Dr Tony Webber says that the 'dysfunctional' GP Management Plans system is open to rorting by practitioners across the board.
It is without doubt that incentive-based programs have an opportunity for fraud, overuse, or misuse. Although it is not acceptable, it is part of the price we pay for having a largely government funded health system.
One of the problems we see with this article is that there is little to describe what real checks and balances are in place to monitor the system, what training was provided to practitioners, and of course - what benefit has been provided to the healthcare consumers who have been beneficiaries of the system.
As recruiters, we work with employers and general practitioners every day to connect people with jobs across the Australasia region. The persistent issue we see is the government doing things to detract from the attractiveness of working as a doctor (particularly a GP) in high need areas.
Although it remains to be seen, the next step will undoubtedly be a government enquiry. There will be people hauled over the coals, and probably a mass requirement for GPs and other practitioners to provide reports to government bodies. Public confidence in medical practitioners may be decreased as a result of the negative media attention.
There ought to be more of a focus on developing the image of the medical profession, particularly those positions in the areas of the most need - and loosening the significant red tape and barriers to working and billing in the system.
Posted by Beat Medical
Posted by Beat Medical
There are so many options for where to live and work as a doctor in Australia that it can be a bit of an overwhelming choice.Posted by Beat Medical
From February this year, the Australian Medical Council will be accepting applications from international medical graduates to be assessed as GPs under the specialist category, possibly negating the need for complex area of need registration, and the like. This is a fantastic move which will hopefully make it a more transparent process for GPs to make the transition to working in Australia. Candidates from the UK, Ireland, Canada, United States, and South Africa will particularly benefit from the level of recognition provided for their qualifications and experience.
Well done AMC and RACGP – a positive move in what is already a complex and difficult system. Next stop…. national medical registration!
Posted by Beat Medical
Working in Australia as a UK trained general practitioner is even easier now with the new RACGP specialist pathway into general practice. In short, as a MRCGP, you can apply for ad eundem fellowship of the Australian college. In most cases, after a twelve month mentoring period, you will be a full fellow of the college.
The Australian Medical Council is responsible for the initial assessment and documentation process to get started as a GP in Australia. There are a number of documents which will need to be provided, as well as a verification process for your academic qualifications. When you start, your head will most likely be swimming with forms and regulations, so it is a good idea to get in contact with a medical recruitment agency to discuss your options. A good recruitment agent can manage the entire application process on your behalf, so you can concentrate on the where and when of starting your new job.
About working conditions in Australia
1
Comments
Post has no comments.